Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Annals of Nuclear En...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Verification and validation of radiation source term capabilities in STREAM

Authors: Bamidele Ebiwonjumi; Sooyoung Choi; Matthieu Lemaire; Deokjung Lee; Ho Cheol Shin; Hwan Soo Lee;

Verification and validation of radiation source term capabilities in STREAM

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the verification and validation of the radiation source term calculation capability implemented in the reactor analysis code STREAM for pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) analysis. Activity, decay heat, neutron and gamma source spectra of irradiated PWR fuel assemblies are calculated with STREAM and ORIGEN and the results obtained are compared. The verification is performed with Westinghouse 15 × 15, 17 × 17 and Combustion Engineering 16 × 16 designs with enrichment of 3–5 wt.% 235U, burnup of 30–60 GWd/t and cooling times of 0.3–1000 years. The radiation source term comparison between STREAM and ORIGEN indicates that the implementation of the source term equations is correct. The validation is done by comparing STREAM calculation results against 91 decay heat calorimetric measurements for 52 PWR fuel assemblies performed at the Swedish central storage facility for spent nuclear fuel, CLAB, and United States Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory (HEDL) and General Electric Morris Operations. The measured fuel assemblies have enrichment of 2–4 wt.% 235U, burnup of 28–51 GWd/t and cooling times of 2–27 years. The comparison between calculated and measured decay heat shows good agreement. For most of the measurements analyzed, the calculated decay heat is within the range of the measurement uncertainty. The average, overall C/E over 71 CLAB decay heat measurements is 1.000 ± 0.017, and 0.997 ± 0.013 for 20 US measurements. Overall, this work demonstrates that STREAM can be reliably used to predict PWR SNF radiation source terms.

Country
Korea (Republic of)
Keywords

690

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%