<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

The causal dynamics between coal consumption and growth: Evidence from emerging market economies

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 01 Jun 2010 Australia Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Applied Energy, volume 87, pages 1,972-1,977 (issn: 0306-2619,

Authors: Apergis, Nicholas; Payne, J.;

doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.035

handle: 20.500.11937/19868

The causal dynamics between coal consumption and growth: Evidence from emerging market economies

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between coal consumption and economic growth for 15 emerging market economies within a multivariate panel framework over the period 1980–2006. The heterogeneous panel cointegration results indicate there is a long-run equilibrium relationship between real GDP, coal consumption, real gross fixed capital formation, and the labor force. While in the long-run both real gross fixed capital formation and the labor force have a significant positive impact on real GDP, coal consumption has a significant negative impact. The panel causality tests show bidirectional causality between coal consumption and economic growth in both the short- and long-run.

Country

Australia

Related Organizations

University of Piraeus
Greece
Illinois State University
United States
Florida State University College of Arts and Sciences
United States
Illinois State University
United States
University of Piraeus
Greece

View all View all

Keywords

330, Coal consumption, Growth, Granger-causality, Panel

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	78
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%