
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Co-digestion of food waste in municipal wastewater treatment plants: Effect of different mixtures on methane yield and hydrolysis rate constant

Abstract Batch trials for co-digestion of raw sludge and food waste using eleven different mass-based mixtures were performed ranging from 5% to 30%. In contrast to conducting digestion trials as replicates in parallel as commonly done in previous studies, replications were performed successively in each trial to capture the variability in yield caused by a changing composition of the substrates. Trials were conducted four times with the same mixture ratios, but always using a fresh charge of inoculum, raw sludge and food waste. Data fitting was applied to assess the effect of the different mixtures on both the ultimate methane yield and the hydrolysis rate constant. The results revealed that with increasing contributions of food waste, the methane yield of the mixtures increased just due to its higher methane potential. The hydrolysis rate constant in the mixtures with a low contribution of food waste (up to 12.5% mass-based or 35% based on volatile solids) derived in batch experiments were higher than the one observed during the mono-digestion. Hence, co-digestion of food waste holds promise not only due to a higher methane yield, but in particular due to the accelerated methane production rate.
- Technical University of Munich Germany
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).174 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
