
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Challenges on primary frequency control and potential solution from EVs in the future GB electricity system

handle: 10044/1/39730
System inertia reduction, driven by the integration of renewables, imposes significant challenges on the primary frequency control. Electrification of road transport not only reduces carbon emission by shifting from fossil fuel consumption to cleaner electricity consumption, but also potentially provide flexibility to facilitate the integration of renewables, such as supporting primary frequency control. In this context, this paper develops a techno-economic evaluation framework to quantify the challenges on primary frequency control and assess the benefits of EVs in providing primary frequency response. A simplified GB power system dynamic model is used to analyze the impact of declining system inertia on the primary frequency control and the technical potential of primary frequency response provision from EVs. Furthermore, an advanced stochastic system scheduling tool with explicitly modeling of inertia reduction effect is applied to assess the cost and emission driven by primary frequency control as well as the benefits of EVs in providing primary frequency response under two representative GB 2030 system scenarios. This paper also identifies the synergy between PFR provision from EVs and “smart charging” strategy as well as the impact of synthetic inertia from wind turbines.
- Cardiff University United Kingdom
- Imperial College London United Kingdom
- Energy Institute United Kingdom
- Tianjin University China (People's Republic of)
- Electric Power Research Institute United States
IMPACTS, Technology, Engineering, Chemical, BRITAIN POWER-SYSTEM, 330, Energy & Fuels, Electric vehicles, FLEXIBILITY, DEMAND, Chemical, RENEWABLE ENERGY INTEGRATION, 09 Engineering, Engineering, BENEFITS, 14 Economics, Primary frequency control, Science & Technology, Energy, Techno-economic evaluation, Stochastic system scheduling, 620, VEHICLES, Dynamic simulation, GENERATION
IMPACTS, Technology, Engineering, Chemical, BRITAIN POWER-SYSTEM, 330, Energy & Fuels, Electric vehicles, FLEXIBILITY, DEMAND, Chemical, RENEWABLE ENERGY INTEGRATION, 09 Engineering, Engineering, BENEFITS, 14 Economics, Primary frequency control, Science & Technology, Energy, Techno-economic evaluation, Stochastic system scheduling, 620, VEHICLES, Dynamic simulation, GENERATION
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).69 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
