Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PURE Aarhus Universi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Biomass and Bioenergy
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Effect of fertilisation on biomass yield, ash and element uptake in SRC willow

Authors: Søren Ugilt Larsen; Uffe Jørgensen; Jens Bonderup Kjeldsen; Poul Erik Lærke;

Effect of fertilisation on biomass yield, ash and element uptake in SRC willow

Abstract

Abstract Optimal fertilization of short rotation coppice (SRC) willow is important both in terms of economic yield and environmental effect. We measured biomass yield and nutrient uptake in two willow clones, Inger and Tordis, grown on a coarse sandy soil and within six different fertilization regimes. Fertilization treatments were carried out during two two-year harvest rotations, beginning in the 2nd growth year of the plantation. Willow was fertilized as follows with names referring to type of fertilizer and total quantities of nitrogen (kg ha −1 ) in first and second year within both rotations: 1) Control 0+0 , 2) NPK 120+0 , 3) Slurry 180+0 , 4) NPK 120+120 , 5) NPK 240+0 , 6) Slurry 360+0 . Fertilization affected biomass yield significantly but interacted with rotation and clone. In first rotation, fertilization increased dry matter (DM) yield across clones significantly from 3.7 Mg ha −1 y −1 for Control 0+0 to 6.5, 6.4 and 5.6 for Slurry 360+0 , NPK 120+120 and NPK 240+0 , respectively. In second rotation, yield increased from 6.2 Mg ha −1 y −1 to 8.8, 8.2, 7.8 and 7.4 for Slurry 360+0 , NPK 240+0 , Slurry 180+0 and NPK 120+120 , respectively. Biomass dry matter yield per ha increased linearly at 15 kg kg −1 of applied total-N in both rotations. The yield increase in response to fertilization was generally larger in Inger than in Tordis. In general, element concentration in the harvested biomass was either unaffected or slightly reduced by fertilization. In conclusion, yield response to fertilization appears to be primarily related to the quantity of N applied but the effect depended on fertilizer type, harvest rotation and willow clone.

Keywords

nutrient concentration, Clone Inger, Salix, Clone Tordis, Gley, fertilizer type

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback