
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Determining the repair and maintenance cost of wood chippers

handle: 20.500.14243/354532
Chipping weighs heavily on the total delivered cost of wood fuel, which calls for accurate chipping cost estimates. Chipper repair and maintenance cost is perhaps the most obscure among the figures required for a reliable estimate of chipping cost. To clarify this issue, the authors examined the long-term repair and maintenance records for 51 wood chippers operated by 48 chipping service contractors. Repair and maintenance represented between 1.5% and 29% of total chipping cost, inclusive of fuel and labour (mean = 14%). The ratio between total accumulated repair (TAR) cost and machine price averaged 32% and varied with total use. The relationship between total use and TAR to price ratio was explored through regression analysis, which produced a very strong model (R-2 = 0.8). This model predicts a TAR to price ratio of 0.64 at 10000 h, with no significant differences between tractor-driven and independent-engine machines. While the coefficients are different, the structure of this model offers a good match with the repair and maintenance cost models developed for farm tractors and other agricultural machinery. A second model was developed for estimating repair and maintenance cost as a function of fuel consumption. The study also provides reference figures for the contribution of labour cost to total maintenance cost. Farm tractors incur more repairs than preventive maintenance, contrary to the other dedicated components of the chipping operation, where preventive maintenance represents most of maintenance cost. Forestry users should make allowance for the lower structural strength of tractors and select large models.
- National Research Council Italy
- Trees and Timber Institute Italy
Machinery, Wear, Depreciation, Forestry, Usage
Machinery, Wear, Depreciation, Forestry, Usage
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).10 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
