Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao PURE Aarhus Universi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Biosystems Engineering
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The efficiency of shredded and briquetted wheat straw in anaerobic co-digestion with dairy cattle manure

Authors: Radziah Wahid; Radziah Wahid; Verónica Moset; Henrik Bjarne Møller; Cristiane de Almeida Neves Xavier;

The efficiency of shredded and briquetted wheat straw in anaerobic co-digestion with dairy cattle manure

Abstract

Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure (CM) with shredded or briquetted wheat straw (SS and BS, respectively) was evaluated in thermophilic continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTR) in two experiments (lab and full-scale). Three lab-scale CSTR (15 l) were used with 20 days hydraulic retention time (HRT); one was fed with CM and the other two with mixtures of CM (95% of fresh matter, FM) and SS or BS (5% FM). In the second experiment, two full-scale CSTR (30 m3) were operated with 25 days HRT; one reactor was fed with CM and the other with CM + BS (9% FM). Ultimate CH4 yield was analysed from each substrate. Biochemical CH4 potential at 21 days for CM, SS and BS were 128; 187 and 200 lSTP [CH4] kg−1 [VS]. Anaerobic digestion of CM, CM + SS and CM + BS in lab-scale reactors yielded 165; 214 and 217 lSTP [CH4] kg−1 [VS]. In full scale-reactors, CM and CM + BS yielded 264 and 351 lSTP [CH4] kg−1 [VS]. Increments of 31 and 33% on CH4 yield were achieved in CM + BS compared to CM in lab and full-scale reactors, respectively. Regarding the energy balance, the energy yields were the same for both reactors using straw as co-substrate (CM + SS and CM + BS) after subtracting the energy consumption of the pretreatment, corresponding to 1100 kWh of net energy output. However, briquetting technology could be advantageous for biogas plants where the straw might be transported over longer distances, due to reduction of the transportation costs.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    69
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
69
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%