
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Driving force behind electrochemical performance of microbial fuel cells fed with different substrates

The performance of miniaturized microbial fuel cells operating with five different substrates (acetate, lactate, glucose and octanoate) were studied with the aim to identify the reason for its different performance. In all cases, the COD removal rate was about 650 mg COD L-1 d-1. However, the bio-electrochemical performance of the MFC was very different, showing the MFC fed with acetate the best performance: 20 A m-2 as maximum current density, 2 W m-2 of maximum power density, 0.376 V of OCV and 12.6% of CE. In addition, the acetate showed the best bio-electrochemical performance in the polarization curves and cyclic voltammetries. These polarization curves were modelled and the key to explain the better electrical performance of acetate was its lower ohmic losses. When working with acetate, its ohmic losses were one log-unit below those attained by the other substrates. These lower ohmic losses were not associated to the electrolyte conductivity of the fuel but to the lower ohmic loses of the biofilm generated.
Aguas residuales, Bioelectric Energy Sources, Ingeniería química, Acetates, Modelos matemáticos, Glucose, Electricity, Biofilms, Electrochemistry, Lactic Acid, Caprylates
Aguas residuales, Bioelectric Energy Sources, Ingeniería química, Acetates, Modelos matemáticos, Glucose, Electricity, Biofilms, Electrochemistry, Lactic Acid, Caprylates
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).41 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
