
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Laboratory characterisation of fracture compressibility for coal and shale gas reservoir rocks: A review

Abstract Unconventional natural gas, including coalbed methane and shale gas, has become important natural gas resources. Coal and shale reservoirs are characterised by low porosity and low permeability and difficult for gas production. These reservoirs are also considered as fractured reservoirs, i.e. the natural fracture/cleat system in coals and bedding direction microfractures in shales. Permeabilities of these reservoirs are sensitive to stress change. During gas production, the pressure drawdown significantly increases effective stress, and thus decreases the absolute permeability. The relationship between permeability and stress is characterised by fracture compressibility, which is difficult and costly to be obtained from the field, but can be acquired easily from laboratory measurement. In this review article, the laboratory methods to obtain fracture compressibility were reviewed. Literature data on fracture compressibility for coals and shales were collated and the relationships between fracture compressibility and pressure, stress and rock properties were discussed. It is found that fracture compressibility is higher for coals than for shales, and the fracture compressibility for proppant supported fracture is even lower than that for the same shale or coal. Moreover, fracture compressibility is variable depending on gas type, gas pressure, and stress. Fracture compressibility has no correlation with absolute permeability in general, but has a weak positive correlation for the same sample.
- Peking University China (People's Republic of)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences China (People's Republic of)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences China (People's Republic of)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences China (People's Republic of)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Australia
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).123 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
