Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Computers & Chemical...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Data-driven predictive corrosion failure model for maintenance planning of process systems

Authors: Rouzbeh Abbassi; Rioshar Yarveisy; Faisal Khan; Faisal Khan;

Data-driven predictive corrosion failure model for maintenance planning of process systems

Abstract

Abstract Extreme value analysis (EVA) is occasionally used to predict corrosion progress. This paper adopts EVA to predict the depth of extreme pits to prioritize inspection and maintenance. It considers the peaks over threshold (POT) method to illustrate the predictive capacity of this method in assessing degradation progress based on consecutive inspection reports. The proposed approach uses distribution parameters to establish stochastic corrosion models. Four consecutive inline inspections of a pipeline are used to validate the model. As the block maxima (BM) method is often used in extreme value analysis of corrosion damage depths, the POT approach is compared to the BM's predictive results. The POT approach is considerably more capable (33%) of assessing failures in individual sections than the same workflow implemented with BM. With the downside of increased falsely categorized failures (10.6%). The method's performance in assessing failures makes it most useful for data-driven maintenance of process systems.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%