
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Sewage in Algerian Oasis: Comparison of the Purifying Efficiency of two Processes (WWTP and WWTAS)

AbstractThe present study was conducted to compare between two treatments of wastewater processes (wastewater treatment plants “WWTP” and wastewater treatment by activated sludge “WWTAS”). To compare the physical and chemical parameters, water was analyzed at the entrance and the exit of each station. Results showed that during the study period, the average removal rates in the case of WWTAS were 85% for SS, 90% for filtered BOD5 and 90% for COD. While in the case of WWTP; the average removal rates were: 92% for SS, 88% for BOD5 and 90% for COD.
Physical Parameters, Plants, Activated Sludge, Chemical Parameters., Energy(all), Wastewater Treatment
Physical Parameters, Plants, Activated Sludge, Chemical Parameters., Energy(all), Wastewater Treatment
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).4 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
