<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Quality Ranking of the Best CO2 Storage Aquifers in the Nordic Countries

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 01 Jul 2017 Norway Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Energy Procedia, volume 114, pages 4,374-4,381 (issn: 1876-6102,

Authors: Bergmo, Per Eirik Strand; Emmel, Benjamin; Anthonsen, K.L.; Aagaard, Per; Mortensen, G M; Sundal, Anja;

doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1589

handle: 10852/61987

Quality Ranking of the Best CO2 Storage Aquifers in the Nordic Countries

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Abstract Ranking of CO 2 storage sites in the Nordic countries has previously been reported from the NORDICCS project. The ranking was based on geological characteristics of reservoir and seal, data coverage and safety evaluation of the storage complex. Estimated storage capacity were included but not taken into account in the ranking except if two storage sites were equally ranked. This paper presents a method for evaluating knowledge gaps for a storage site based on characterisation and assessment criteria presented in the EU CCS Directive, and a new updated ranking is presented where knowledge gaps are taken into account.

Country

Norway

Related Organizations

University of Oslo
Norway
Geological Survey of Finland
Finland
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Denmark
SINTEF AS
Norway
SINTEF AS
Norway

View all View all

Keywords

330

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	7
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average