Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Electrochimica Actaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Electrochimica Acta
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The significance of electrochemical noise measurements on asymmetric electrodes

Authors: Robert A. Cottis;

The significance of electrochemical noise measurements on asymmetric electrodes

Abstract

Abstract The technique of electrochemical noise measurement has now reached a relatively mature state, in that the methods required to make reliable measurements are well-understood, and some aspects of the analysis of such measurements have achieved general acceptance. Thus, the analysis of the resultant data in terms of the noise resistance, R n , is widely accepted, and methods for the extraction of information about corrosion type are starting to become available. One requirement of most of the analysis methods is the assumption that the two electrodes used to determine the current noise are similar. This assumption is always something of a concern, and a number of methods have been proposed to enable the simultaneous or sequential determination of both potential and current noise associated with a single electrode, so that the assumption of similarity is not necessary. This paper is concerned with methods that use deliberately asymmetric electrodes. The normal justification for using deliberately asymmetric electrodes is to permit the study of what is happening on one of the two electrodes. The situation that applies when two asymmetric working electrodes are coupled together and the current and potential noise determined has been analysed previously. Unfortunately, however, the significance of this work has not generally been appreciated by those groups using asymmetric electrodes. In part this may be because the prior analysis did not explicitly consider the theoretical and experimental justification claimed for this type of experiment, and this paper aims to review this analysis, and to rationalise the claims and observations of previous workers.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze