Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Energy Conversion an...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Energy Conversion and Management
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Sensitivity analysis of uncertain parameters based on an improved proton exchange membrane fuel cell analytical model

Authors: Yang Jiang; Zirong Yang; Kui Jiao; Qing Du;

Sensitivity analysis of uncertain parameters based on an improved proton exchange membrane fuel cell analytical model

Abstract

Abstract In this study, an enhanced non-isothermal, two-phase 1D analytical proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) model is developed, which not only considers the water saturation jump, but also proposes a novel method to analytically solve the water phase changes and couple the liquid and vapor transport together. A stringent model validation procedure is used to show good agreement between the simulated results and the experimental data, taking advantage of the “three-step” and “multi-case” validation methods. It is revealed that the uncertain parameters may deteriorate model reliability and credibility, thus demonstrating the necessity to conduct sensitivity analysis. A multi-parametric screening method i.e. the elementary effect (EE) method based on Monte Carlo experiments is implemented to comprehensively analyze the total 22 uncertain parameters (including geometric, physical and electrochemical parameters), which are finally classified into very sensitive ones, rather sensitive ones and insensitive ones. The cathodic parameters are found more sensitive than the anodic ones, and the parameters of different components may have distinct sensitivity. Besides, whether the effect of each parameter is positive or negative on cell performance is also discussed. Furthermore, three cases with different groups of parameters are presented, which show almost the same polarization curve, and the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test is applied to verify the stability difference. It is concluded that those uncertain parameters not only influence the cell performance but also affect the model stability, and hence the effects of varying operating conditions should be taken into account in validation work.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    85
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
85
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%