Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Energy Conversion an...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Energy Conversion and Management
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Technoeconomic and emissions evaluation of mobile in-woods biochar production

Authors: Shahabaddine Sokhansanj; Daniel L. Sanchez; Sonal K. Thengane; Sonal K. Thengane; Kevin S. Kung; C. Jim Lim; Robert A. York;

Technoeconomic and emissions evaluation of mobile in-woods biochar production

Abstract

Abstract In-woods torrefaction of forest residues to produce biochar can sequester CO2 in long-lived products at potentially lower-cost and complexity than centralized biochar production. Yet there are major uncertainties around operations, cost, and emissions associated with in-woods processing. We present a technoeconomic and emissions analysis for mobile in-woods biochar production systems employing oxidative torrefaction, associated with a timber harvest in Jackson Demonstration State Forest (JDSF) of California as case study. Most of the processing site area is required for the pile of grinded slash feed and drying operations. Breakeven production costs for transport, processing, and application together range between 567 and 573 USD/ton biochar-C (equivalent to 392–341 USD/ton biochar). The dryer, if employed, and the reactor constitute the major portion of capital costs. Labor constitute the largest portion of operating costs, followed by tub grinder rental and biochar application within the forest soil. The requirement of a separate dryer can be relaxed for a mobile in-woods facility, as oxidative torrefaction provides the opportunity to process feedstock with relatively high moisture content (~50%). The respective net GHG emissions for two systems with and without dryer are 5.43 and 7.94 ton CO2 eq/ton biochar-C. However, when the emissions from natural decay of slash (if left unprocessed) are accounted as avoided emissions, the systems with and without dryer result in the respective GHG emission benefits of 6.61 and 4.85 ton CO2 eq/ton biochar-C. The systems reach their break-even point when CO2 emission benefits are valued at a minimum of 85.7–118.1 USD/ton CO2.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%