
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Scrutinizing effect of temperature and pressure variation of a double-pressure dual-cycle geothermal power plant turbines on the temperature profile and heat gain of the heat exchangers

In geothermal power plants with dual pressure cycle technology, the optimisation of turbine inlet parameters depending on the pressure and temperature of the geothermal fluid is a very important parameter affecting the production capacity of such plants. In combined systems, where the second stage (low pressure) is fed by the first stage (high pressure), failure to determine the appropriate operating conditions leads to the problem of not achieving optimum performance. In this context, the study aims to develop a methodology for predicting the performance of the system, based on the geothermal water temperatures entering and leaving the heat exchangers, in order to clearly see the effect of the operations carried out within the scope of optimising the turbine inlet parameters on the system behaviour. In this study, EBSILON (R) Professional software developed by Steag GbmH was utilised to simulate the determined correlations. The effect of the heat exchangers (preheater, evaporator and superheater) in both stage-1 and stage-2 on the temperature profiles and heat gains were determined at 10-17 bar, 126.5-165 degrees C for Turbine-1 and 4-8 bar, 84-135 degrees C for Turbine-2. Optimum turbine inlet temperature and pressure have been determined for maximum heat input and exergy efficiency. In this context, each cycle in the Energy Converter System (ECS) was first simulated by changing the turbine input parameters and then thermal analyses of the system were performed using the performance outputs obtained from the simulation software. For turbine-1, it is observed that heat transfer decreases in stage-1 with increasing pressure and temperature, while heat transfer increases in stage-2 fed from stage-1. After 12 bar and 136 degrees C, the heat transfer of the ECS started to increase and the maximum heat transfer amount was reached at 17 bar and 155 degrees C. However, it was determined that the exergy efficiency of the ECS started to decrease after 15 bar and 147.6 degrees C. For turbine-2, it was found that the increase in pressure and temperature decreases the ECS heat transfer but increases the exergy efficiency. As a result of numerous iterations with EBSILON (R) Professional software, a maximum exergy efficiency of 50.53% was achieved in turbine-1 (15 bar, 147.6 degrees C) and turbine-2 (8 bar, 114 degrees C).
Heat-flow, Working Fluid, Energy & Fuels, Turbines, Firedamp, Geothermal fields, Fluidized bed process, Exergy efficiencies, Mechanics, Low temperature production, Dual cycle, Temperature profile, Heat transfer performance, Geothermal power plant, Pressure and temperature, Temperature profiles, Waste Heat, Geothermal power plants, Energy converters, Converter system, Heat gains, Temperature and pressures, Organic Rankine Cycle, Heat exchanger, Thermodynamics, Geothermal power, Heat flow
Heat-flow, Working Fluid, Energy & Fuels, Turbines, Firedamp, Geothermal fields, Fluidized bed process, Exergy efficiencies, Mechanics, Low temperature production, Dual cycle, Temperature profile, Heat transfer performance, Geothermal power plant, Pressure and temperature, Temperature profiles, Waste Heat, Geothermal power plants, Energy converters, Converter system, Heat gains, Temperature and pressures, Organic Rankine Cycle, Heat exchanger, Thermodynamics, Geothermal power, Heat flow
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
