Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Energy Economicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Energy Economics
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Impacts of China's differential electricity pricing on the productivity of energy-intensive industries

Authors: Xuemei Zheng; Chengkuan Wu; Shijun He;

Impacts of China's differential electricity pricing on the productivity of energy-intensive industries

Abstract

Abstract Using China's Industrial Enterprise Database (CIED) from 1998 to 2007, this paper investigates how the differential electricity pricing (DEP) policy affects the total factor productivity (TFP) of energy-intensive industries in China. Based on the TFP of energy-intensive industries estimated through the Olley-Pakes (OP) and Levinston-Petrin (LP) approaches, this paper estimates the treatment effects of the DEP policy through the method of propensity score matching and difference in differences (PSM-DID). The results indicate a significant negative effect of the DEP on the TFP of energy-intensive industries shortly after the DEP implementation. This finding could be explained by the rapidly increasing costs for energy-saving technologies that occurred within firms over a short time. Moreover, the estimated dynamic marginal effects demonstrate that the policy effect became positive in the following years, implying that the role the DEP policy plays shifted from increasing costs to stimulating technology improvement for energy-intensive industries. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that the treatment effects remain large and statistically significant for regions less dependent on energy-intensive industries, regions with better policy enforcement, and small-sized firms. The results remain robust in the counterfactual test, in the robustness check that takes account of the lagging effect of policy and in the robustness checks that considers more control variables or extends the time period of analysis. Based on these findings, this paper provides important policy implications for better design of the mechanisms to improve the productivity in China.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%