
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
How does low-carbon energy transition alleviate energy poverty in China? A nonparametric panel causality analysis

Abstract Low-carbon energy transition is conducive to saving energy and reducing emissions, and its impact on energy poverty warrants intensive attention. By employing a balanced panel dataset of China's 30 provinces for the period 2004–2017, we examine the causal relationship between low-carbon energy transition and energy poverty by using a novel nonparametric panel causality-in-quantiles (PCIQ) method. Also, the internal impact mechanism between low-carbon energy transition and energy poverty is analyzed. The primary findings of our study imply that low-carbon energy transition shows significant bidirectional causality with energy poverty alleviation. And the low-carbon energy transition can stimulate energy poverty alleviation by affecting poverty in the availability of energy services, the cleanness of energy consumption, the integrity of energy management, and energy affordability and efficiency. Our findings provide an important reference for the government to formulate relevant policies that promote the alleviation of energy poverty.
- Beijing Institute of Foreign Trade China (People's Republic of)
- Central South University China (People's Republic of)
- University of International Business and Economics China (People's Republic of)
- Beijing Institute of Foreign Trade China (People's Republic of)
- Central South University China (People's Republic of)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).160 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
