
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Comparative study of native and impregnated coconut husk with pulp and paper industry waste water for fuel gas production

Comparative study of native and impregnated coconut husk with pulp and paper industry waste water for fuel gas production
Abstract Coconut husk was treated with pulp and paper industry wastewater for impregnating metal constituents present in it. The present work was focused on humidified air as an alternative to steam for generation of hydrogen-rich fuel gas in an updraft fixed-bed gasification column. A series of experiments were performed to see the effect of temperature, air/humidified air and CO2 addition on gas yield and composition. Furthermore, some experiments were also conducted by varying impregnation temperature at the optimum condition to see the effect of impregnation temperature on gas yield and calorific value. The gross calorific value (GCV) of coconut husk C53.84H77.80O43.99N was estimated as 23.21 MJ/kg. The fuel gas production was found in the range from 0.68 to 2.89 Nm3/kg for native and from 0.83 to 3.13 Nm3/kg for impregnated coconut husk. The GCV of fuel gas yield was found to be maximum of 12578 kJ/Nm3 for impregnated coconut husk at impregnation temperature of 105 °C, retrofitted with CO2 in humidified air. The concentration of hydrogen was found maximum for impregnated coconut husk. The present gasification process not only provides feasibility of green energy but also renders to reduce the pressure of the environmental pollution created by the unutilized coconut husk.
15 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2004IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2008IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).29 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
