
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
An integrated hesitant 2-tuple Pythagorean fuzzy analysis of QFD-based innovation cost and duration for renewable energy projects

handle: 20.500.12511/9121
This study evaluates quality function deployment-based innovation pathways for renewable energy projects. For this purpose, a 2-stage novel model is suggested. Firstly, the weights of the factors are calculated by considering Pythagorean fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory methodology based on 2-tuple linguistic values. With the help of the impact-relation map, the activities, and immediate predecessors are identified. Within this context, five different paths are determined for this situation. Secondly, the duration pathways and innovation costs are calculated for renewable energy projects. The findings indicate that the activities A (customer expectations) and E (production requirement) play the most critical role because they take place in all different paths. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that renewable energy investment companies should take necessary actions to satisfy customer expectations, such as offering affordable products and providing necessary information for the use of these projects.
- Shaanxi University of Science and Technology China (People's Republic of)
- Shaanxi University of Science and Technology China (People's Republic of)
- Istanbul Medipol University Turkey
Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets, QFD, Project Development, DEMATEL, Renewable Energy
Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets, QFD, Project Development, DEMATEL, Renewable Energy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).74 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
