<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Reply on “Comments on ‘Uncertainties in estimating production costs of future nuclear technologies: A model-based analysis of small modular reactors’ [Energy 281 (2023) 128204]”

Name: Reply on “Comments on ‘Uncertainties in estimating production costs of future nuclear technologies: A model-based analysis of small modular reactors’ [Energy 281 (2023) 128204]”
Keywords: Cost forecasting, Production theory, 600, Monte-Carlo simulation, Nuclear power, SMR, 510

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 01 Dec 2024 Denmark, Germany Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Energy, volume 313, page 133,828 (issn: 0360-5442,

Authors: Björn Steigerwald; Jens Weibezahn; Martin Slowik; Christian von Hirschhausen;

doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133828

handle: 10398/6581ba88-da3d-4ea5-bff2-1651fad887bc

Reply on “Comments on ‘Uncertainties in estimating production costs of future nuclear technologies: A model-based analysis of small modular reactors’ [Energy 281 (2023) 128204]”

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This reply aims to address the points raised in an analysis provided in the comment entitled “Comments on ‘Uncertainties in estimating production costs of future nuclear technologies: A model-based analysis of small modular reactors’ [Energy 281 (2023) 128204]”, specifically on the used scaling coefficients and cost assumptions.

Countries

Denmark, Germany

Related Organizations

Copenhagen Business School
Denmark
University of Mannheim
Germany

Keywords

Cost forecasting, Production theory, 600, Monte-Carlo simulation, Nuclear power, SMR, 510

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average

Related to Research communities

Aurora Universities Network

Energy Research