Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Energy Research & So...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Energy Research & Social Science
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The social and ecological footprint of renewable power generation plants. Balancing social requirements and ecological impacts in an integrated approach

Authors: Barbara S. Zaunbrecher; Benjamin Daniels; Martina Roß-Nickoll; Martina Ziefle;

The social and ecological footprint of renewable power generation plants. Balancing social requirements and ecological impacts in an integrated approach

Abstract

Abstract It is necessary to combine ecological and social assessment of energy supply options in an integrated approach to come to a holistic understanding of acceptable scenarios. The study thus argues the importance of a thorough ecological basis for social acceptance analyses in this context and exemplifies an integrated approach in which scenarios are evaluated from both ecological and social perspectives. To illustrate the methodology, first, spatially explicit scenarios of electricity supply were assessed according to their ecological footprint by deducing ecological values of the respective landscapes from biotope valences. Following, the scenarios and their ecological assessment served as input for an empirical survey to assess attitudes and preference for an electricity mix (shares of wind power, photovoltaics (PV), and biogas), land use for the infrastructure (in the forest/on pastures), as well as specific combinations of electricity mix and land use. It is shown how, by this two-step procedure, socially preferred and ecologically sustainable scenarios (in this case, electricity mix with a high share of PV (on roofs) with the remaining infrastructure on pastures) can be identified and evaluated within one frame of reference. Methodological challenges and policy implications of the approach are discussed.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%