
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Purely ornamental? Public perceptions of distributed energy storage in the United Kingdom

Distributed energy storage technologies (DES) are expected to help in decarbonising the power sector, decentralising power sources and meeting the mismatch between the produced and consumed energy. However, the likelihood of the use and acceptance of these technologies will partly hinge on public perceptions. Here, we present results of three focus groups and dialogue from the city of Leeds (UK) held with members the lay public with and without personal experience of technology (photovoltaic panels) about public perceptions of distributed energy storage technologies at household and community scale. We apply and adapt the Energy Cultures framework, which was initially developed for understanding energy behaviours as mediated by individual psychological factors, by practice-based, energy-related culture and infrastructural elements. Accordingly, we connect what people think, do and have in energy contexts, to better understand perceptions of DES technologies as part of a broader renewable energy landscape (culture) that is both materially and socially constructed. We show how a variety of elements such as forms of energy consumption; costs; expectations of family members; previous experiences; perceptions of government and the municipal authority; and expectations about the technologies, are likely to shape acceptance and adoption of battery storage at the household and community level.
Household and community energy storage, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/nachhaltigkeitswissenschaft; name=Sustainability Science, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2104; name=Nuclear Energy and Engineering, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2105; name=Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Batteries, /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/affordable_and_clean_energy; name=SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Renewable Energy, Energy Cultures framework, Sustainability and the Environment, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2103; name=Fuel Technology, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3301; name=Social Sciences (miscellaneous), Fuel Technology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Attitudes, Social Sciences (miscellaneous), /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2102; name=Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Household and community energy storage, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/nachhaltigkeitswissenschaft; name=Sustainability Science, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2104; name=Nuclear Energy and Engineering, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2105; name=Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Batteries, /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/affordable_and_clean_energy; name=SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Renewable Energy, Energy Cultures framework, Sustainability and the Environment, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2103; name=Fuel Technology, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3301; name=Social Sciences (miscellaneous), Fuel Technology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Attitudes, Social Sciences (miscellaneous), /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2102; name=Energy Engineering and Power Technology
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).73 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
