<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

The development of stationary battery storage systems in Germany – A market review

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 01 Jun 2020 Germany Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Journal of Energy Storage, volume 29, page 101,153 (issn: 2352-152X,

Authors: Dirk Uwe Sauer; Martin Robinius; Peter Stenzel; Georg Angenendt; Detlef Stolten; Detlef Stolten; Kai-Philipp Kairies; +4 Authors

doi: 10.1016/j.est.2019.101153 , 10.18154/rwth-2020-04542

The development of stationary battery storage systems in Germany – A market review

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Journal of energy storage 29, 101153 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101153

Published by Elsevier, Amsterdam [u.a.]

Country

Germany

Related Organizations

RWTH Aachen University
Germany
Forschungszentrum Jülich
Germany
Jülich Aachen Research Alliance
Germany
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres
Germany
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
Germany

Keywords

info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/333.7, 333.7

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	186
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 0.1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 0.1%