
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Methods to estimate aboveground wood productivity from long-term forest inventory plots

handle: 10871/19219 , 10088/22045
Forest inventory plots are widely used to estimate biomass carbon storage and its change over time. While there has been much debate and exploration of the analytical methods for calculating biomass, the methods used to determine rates of wood production have not been evaluated to the same degree. This affects assessment of ecosystem fluxes and may have wider implications if inventory data are used to parameterise biospheric models, or scaled to large areas in assessments of carbon sequestration. Here we use a dataset of 35 long-term Amazonian forest inventory plots to test different methods of calculating wood production rates. These address potential biases associated with three issues that routinely impact the interpretation of tree measurement data: (1) changes in the point of measurement (POM) of stem diameter as trees grow over time; (2) unequal length of time between censuses; and (3) the treatment of trees that pass the minimum diameter threshold (‘‘recruits’’). We derive corrections that control for changing POM height, that account for the unobserved growth of trees that die within census intervals, and that explore different assumptions regarding the growth of recruits during the previous census interval. For our dataset we find that annual aboveground coarse wood production (AGWP; in Mg ha � 1
- National Institute of Amazonian Research Brazil
- National University of Saint Anthony the Abbot in Cuzco Peru
- University College London United Kingdom
- University of Leeds United Kingdom
- Smithsonian Institution Archives United States
Carbon Sequestration, Census, Phytomass, Surveys, Forest Inventory, 333, Statistical Tests, 630, Analytical Method, Diameter, Growth Rate, Amazonian Forests, Tropical Forest, Biomass, Productivity, Ecology, Recruitment (population Dynamics), Forestry, Wood, Carbon, Statistical Analysis, Point Of Measurement, Tropical Atmospheres, Wood Products, Census Interval, Biological Production, Recruitment, Estimation
Carbon Sequestration, Census, Phytomass, Surveys, Forest Inventory, 333, Statistical Tests, 630, Analytical Method, Diameter, Growth Rate, Amazonian Forests, Tropical Forest, Biomass, Productivity, Ecology, Recruitment (population Dynamics), Forestry, Wood, Carbon, Statistical Analysis, Point Of Measurement, Tropical Atmospheres, Wood Products, Census Interval, Biological Production, Recruitment, Estimation
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).81 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
