Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Cost competitive membrane—cryogenic post-combustion carbon capture

Authors: Sandra E. Kentish; Dianne E. Wiley; Minh T. Ho; Colin A. Scholes; Geoff W. Stevens;

Cost competitive membrane—cryogenic post-combustion carbon capture

Abstract

Abstract Recently it has been postulated that a post combustion capture process with three membrane stages and cryogenic separation can achieve high CO 2 recovery and purity while being economically competitive with existing commercial carbon capture technology ( Merkel et al., 2010 ). The advantage of this design is the use of burner feed air as a membrane sweep gas to ensure high CO 2 recovery. However, this results in dilution of oxygen in the burner and reduces the overall efficiency of the power station. In this study, two modifications to this process are considered. First, to ensure that the feed burner air supply is not oxygen deficient, we consider the addition of a small air separation membrane unit on this feed air supply. The O 2 enrichment design allows much greater CO 2 concentrations to be accommodated within this burner air supply. The resulting capture cost of the optimised process is reduced to less than US$ 32 per tonne avoided, with a burner air supply containing 33 mol% CO 2 . If flue gas desulphurisation and selective catalytic reduction are required then the cost of capture is less than US$ 43 per tonne avoided. However, one of the consequences of the oxygen enrichment is the need for four membrane stages which may limit its practical application. In comparison, a simplified process that removes the final CO 2 membrane concentration while still achieving high CO 2 recovery has increased energy demand and operating costs but results in lower overall capital cost. The cost of capture of this simplified process remains comparable at less than US$ 35 per tonne avoided for a sweep gas containing 9 mol% CO 2 .

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    79
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
79
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%