Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Potential for using municipal solid waste as a resource for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)

Authors: Peter J. Cook; Nasim Pour; Paul A. Webley;

Potential for using municipal solid waste as a resource for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)

Abstract

Abstract Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) is a carbon removal technology that offers permanent net removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. One of the significant bioenergy resources is organic waste collected from municipal solid waste (MSW). The goal of this study was to provide an estimate of the global potential for using municipal solid waste as a resource for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and to compare the feasibility of two specific BECCS options: municipal solid waste incineration with carbon capture and storage (MSW-CCS), and landfill gas combusted in a gas turbine with carbon capture and storage (LFG-CCS). To assess the feasibility of MSW-based BECCS options, techno-economic and environmental impact assessments were conducted. In the case of a “business-as-usual” scenario with no emission policy in effect, the levelised cost of electricity production from both BECCS options is higher than a coal power plant with CCS. However, these BECCS systems offer a lower cost of avoided CO2. Introducing renewable energy certificates or negative emission refund schemes to BECCS has a significant impact on the economic viability of these technologies in coal-dominant power markets. Environmental impact assessment shows that around 0.7 kg CO2-eq is removed for each kg of wet MSW incinerated, for the MSW-CCS scenario. This translates to approximately negative 2.8 billion tonnes CO2 if all the available 4 billion tonnes MSW generated per year by 2100 is utilised in a MSW-CCS system. The net GHG emission of the LFG-CCS system with an average LFG collection rate of 75% was 0.56 kg CO2-eq. Challenges include the dispersed nature of MSW resources and the lack of economic support schemes, such as commonly apply to solar and wind. Nonetheless, MSW-based BECCS technologies have significant potential for abating and in some cases removing considerable amounts of the greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, thereby contributing significantly to the COP21 emission reduction targets.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    138
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
138
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%