Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Power Sou...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Power Sources
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of discretization methods applied to the single-particle model of lithium-ion batteries

Authors: Aldo Romero-Becerril; Luis Alvarez-Icaza;

Comparison of discretization methods applied to the single-particle model of lithium-ion batteries

Abstract

Abstract The single-particle model is a useful mathematical representation for state-of-charge observation, parameter identification and control of lithium-ion batteries. This model is a simplified electrochemical formulation where ionic intercalation, described as a diffusive process, is considered as the dominant dynamics. In the search for a more efficient numerical solution of the involved partial differential equations, many approximations have been reported. However, most of them are valid just under restricted operating conditions. In this paper, spatial semidiscretization is reintroduced as the precision of approximations could be arbitrarily chosen with this approach. Three discretization methods are applied in a classical fashion, evaluated and compared in both time and frequency domains: finite difference, finite element and differential quadrature. In addition, two commonly used low order approximations are tested against semidiscretization approximations. The best results are obtained with the differential quadrature method in its polynomial version. Two model truncation criteria are also explored, one is based on bandwidth selection and the other on residue analysis, where the first resulted to be more conservative. Finally, simulations of representative reduced order approximations of the single-particle model are compared against experimental data found in the literature.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    59
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
59
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%