
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Simulation and evaluation of capacity recovery methods for spiral-wound lithium ion batteries

Abstract An electrochemical model is developed to investigate capacity recovery methods for cycled lithium ion batteries. Different capacity recovery methods are evaluated and compared. The center recovery method for commercial batteries is found to be impractical because it causes severe solid surface concentration gradients which may harm the batteries. On the contrary, the center recovery method for novel batteries with porous current collector sheets is better than the bottom recovery method because smaller solid surface concentration gradients are detected and less relaxation time is required during capacity recovery. Capacity recovery methods which discharge negative electrodes is superior to those which discharge positive electrodes of cycled batteries as smaller solid surface concentration gradients is generated and less relaxation time is required at the same discharging current.
- National University of Singapore Singapore
- Tsinghua University China (People's Republic of)
Spiral-wound, Porous current collector, 600, Capacity recovery, Lithium ion battery
Spiral-wound, Porous current collector, 600, Capacity recovery, Lithium ion battery
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).21 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
