
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Application of current steps and design of experiments methodology to the detection of water management faults in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack

Abstract We apply a 2 5−1 fractional factorial Design of Experiments (DoE) test plan in order to discriminate the direct effects and interactions of five factors on the water management of a 500 We PEMFC stack. The stack is submitted to current steps between different operating levels and several responses are extracted for the DoE analysis. A strong ageing effect on stack and cell performances is observed. Therefore, in order to perform the DoE analysis, responses which values are too strongly affected by ageing are “corrected” prior to the analysis. A “virtual” stack, considered as “healthy”, is also “reconstructed” by “putting in series” the cells exhibiting very low performance drop. The results show that stacks and cells' resistivities are mostly impacted by direct effects of both temperature and cathodic inlet relative humidity and by compensating interaction between temperature and anodic overstoichiometric ratio. It also appears that two responses are able to distinguish a “healthy” stack from a degraded stack: heterogeneities in cell voltages and cell resistivities distributions. They are differently impacted by considered effects and interactions. Thus, a customised water management strategy could be developed, depending on the stack's state of health to maintain it in the best possible operating conditions.
- University of Franche-Comté France
- European Institute United States
- European Institute United States
- European Institute for Energy Research Germany
[PHYS.MECA.MEFL]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Mechanics of the fluids [physics.class-ph], [SPI.NRJ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power, [SPI.AUTO]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Automatic, [PHYS.MECA.THER]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Thermics [physics.class-ph], [PHYS.MECA.MEFL]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Fluid mechanics [physics.class-ph]
[PHYS.MECA.MEFL]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Mechanics of the fluids [physics.class-ph], [SPI.NRJ]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Electric power, [SPI.AUTO]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Automatic, [PHYS.MECA.THER]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Thermics [physics.class-ph], [PHYS.MECA.MEFL]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Fluid mechanics [physics.class-ph]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).21 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
