
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Suitability of representative electrochemical energy storage technologies for ramp-rate control of photovoltaic power

handle: 1959.4/unsworks_57076
Abstract Photovoltaic (PV) systems can exhibit rapid variances in their power output due to irradiance changes which can destabilise an electricity grid. This paper presents a quantitative comparison of the suitability of different electrochemical energy storage system (ESS) technologies to provide ramp-rate control of power in PV systems. Our investigations show that, for PV systems ranging from residential rooftop systems to megawatt power systems, lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities (up to 600 Wh L−1) require the smallest power-normalised volumes to achieve the ramp rate limit of 10% min−1 with 100% compliance. As the system size increases, the ESS power-normalised volume requirements are significantly reduced due to aggregated power smoothing, with high power lithium-ion batteries becoming increasingly more favourable with increased PV system size. The possibility of module-level ramp-rate control is also introduced, and results show that achievement of a ramp rate of 10% min−1 with 100% compliance with typical junction box sizes will require ESS energy and power densities of 400 Wh L−1 and 2300 W L−1, respectively. While module-level ramp-rate control can reduce the impact of solar intermittence, the requirement is challenging, especially given the need for low cost and long cycle life.
- UNSW Sydney Australia
anzsrc-for: 4016 Materials Engineering, 34 Chemical Sciences, 621, 4016 Materials Engineering, anzsrc-for: 34 Chemical Sciences, 620, anzsrc-for: 40 Engineering, anzsrc-for: 3406 Physical Chemistry, 3406 Physical Chemistry, 7 Affordable and Clean Energy, 4008 Electrical Engineering, anzsrc-for: 09 Engineering, anzsrc-for: 4008 Electrical Engineering, anzsrc-for: 03 Chemical Sciences, 40 Engineering
anzsrc-for: 4016 Materials Engineering, 34 Chemical Sciences, 621, 4016 Materials Engineering, anzsrc-for: 34 Chemical Sciences, 620, anzsrc-for: 40 Engineering, anzsrc-for: 3406 Physical Chemistry, 3406 Physical Chemistry, 7 Affordable and Clean Energy, 4008 Electrical Engineering, anzsrc-for: 09 Engineering, anzsrc-for: 4008 Electrical Engineering, anzsrc-for: 03 Chemical Sciences, 40 Engineering
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).28 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
