
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Determining shale organic porosity and total organic carbon by combining spin echo, solid echo and magic echo

Abstract Organic matter in shale is very important for shale evaluation. However, current methods for evaluating the structure and porosity of organic matter are time consuming and expensive. Previous low-field NMR work using magic-echo methods provided relationships between magic echo T 1 − T 2 data and total organic carbon (TOC) of shales using partial least-squares regression (PLSR), but uncertainty in estimation of organic pores indicated further study was required. The magic echo and solid echo measurements produce additional signal in the oil shale samples compared to the standard methodologies. The difference between these signals is mainly caused by the homonuclear dipolar coupling in the organic matter; therefore, it implies the content of the organic matter. Compared to the spin echo method, the solid echo and magic echo measurements are able to access additional information of the quantity and porosity of the organic matter in shale samples. Based on this, we suggest a new method using the amplitude of magic echo, solid echo and spin echo to obtain information about quantity and porosity of the organic matter in oil shale samples. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the new method for organic matter estimation.
- Harvard University United States
- Xiamen University China (People's Republic of)
- China University of Petroleum, Beijing China (People's Republic of)
- Xiamen University China (People's Republic of)
- Sinopec China (People's Republic of)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).9 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
