Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Powder Technologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Powder Technology
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Combining 10 meta-heuristic algorithms, CFD, DOE, MGGP and PROMETHEE II for optimizing Stairmand cyclone separator

Authors: Elham Kashani; Ali Mohebbi; Ahad Izadi;

Combining 10 meta-heuristic algorithms, CFD, DOE, MGGP and PROMETHEE II for optimizing Stairmand cyclone separator

Abstract

Abstract Gas cyclone separators have been widely used in different industries. In this study, to find the best geometrical ratios of Stairmand cyclone separator, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), design of experiments (DOE), multi-gene genetic programming (MGGP), and ten meta-heuristic algorithms were combined. Six geometrical dimensions of the gas cyclone separator including inlet height and width, vortex finder length and its diameter, cylinder height and cone-tip diameter were optimized. The obtained models from MGGP were optimized by ten meta-heuristic algorithms and non-dominated Pareto fronts were analyzed using six unary and binary metrics and PROMETHEE II as a decision making method. According to the optimization results, multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) showed the best performance and generated more preferred designs than Stairmand design compared to other algorithms. These preferred designs increased the collection efficiency within 0.36 to 6% and decreased the pressure drop within 3.3 to 27.5% compared to the Stairmand.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%