Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Renewable Energyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Renewable Energy
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of BEM-CFD and full rotor geometry simulations for the performance and flow field of a marine current turbine

Authors: Zhengwei Wang; Qiang Guo; Lingjiu Zhou;

Comparison of BEM-CFD and full rotor geometry simulations for the performance and flow field of a marine current turbine

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies have coupled blade element momentum (BEM) theory with the Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes equations in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, as the BEM-CFD method to analyse the flows in marine current turbines is with much less computational resources. The accuracy of the BEM-CFD calculation was evaluated by analysing the performance and flow field characteristics of an isolated horizontal axis marine current turbine with comparisons to a full rotor geometry simulation and experimental data. The comparisons show that the full rotor geometry simulation gives good predictions near the optimal conditions (TSR = 5–7), but is less accurate for off-design conditions. The BEM-CFD results, which are based on two-dimensional hydrofoil theory, are evaluated using the experimental and numerical lift and drag coefficients. It shows that the two-dimensional lift and drag coefficients had significant effects on the BEM-CFD predictions. Overall, the BEM-CFD based on the numerical hydrofoil data can accurately predict the thrust, but generally overestimates the power. The influence of the lift and drag terms on the BEM-CFD predictions suggest that more reasonable 2D predictions for hydrofoils and the 3D effects should be considered to improve the BEM-CFD accuracy. BEM-CFD can reasonably reflect the circumferential averaged velocity characteristics near the rotor for the optimal condition (TSR = 6) and gets symmetrical features in the wake, but it cannot predict the detailed flow features caused by the finite number of blades due to the limitations of the BEM-CFD method.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    42
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
42
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%