
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Field performance evaluation of geothermal ORC power plants with a focus on radial outflow turbines

handle: 11311/1129380
Abstract The calculation of the performance of an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) and its components (in particularly the turbine) is generally not a trivial task because of the lack of a proper instrumentation, the inaccuracy of the available measurements and the uncertainty on fluid thermodynamic properties calculation. These limitations can greatly affect the final computed results especially for complex fluids with a small temperature drop in expansion. A strategy to solve the inconsistency of the measured data set is to verify the energy and mass balance of each component and of the overall plant using also information related to the geometry of specific components, primarily the turbine as well as electrical measurements. After a brief description of the radial outflow turbine and of its main features, two operating geothermal ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) plants installed by Exergy Spa in Turkey are described. For both plants a methodology for the consistency check of the experimental data set is presented with a description of the installed instrumentation, the test procedure and methods used to calculate the turbine efficiency as well as the overall power cycle performance.
Double level ORC; Experimental campaign; Geothermal energy; Turbine efficiency
Double level ORC; Experimental campaign; Geothermal energy; Turbine efficiency
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).21 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
