Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Renewable Energyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Renewable Energy
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Economic viability and investment returns of innovative geothermal tri-generation systems: A comparative study

Authors: Qian, Xiaoyan; Dai, Jie; Jiang, Weimin; Cai, Helen; Ye, Xixi; Vafadaran, Mohammad Shahab;

Economic viability and investment returns of innovative geothermal tri-generation systems: A comparative study

Abstract

In a world grappling with escalating energy needs, environmental concerns, and economic constraints, the transition to renewable energy becomes critical. This study delves into geothermal energy, a promising renewable source, to develop four distinctive tri-generation systems (producing power, heat, and freshwater) optimized for economic efficiency and investment returns. The primary focus is on assessing these systems through an innovative lens of economic viability, including net present value (NPV) and payback periods, alongside their thermodynamic performance. Notably, System B emerges as the most economically advantageous, boasting the shortest payback period of 3.65 years and the highest NPV of $2.38 million, while System C trails with the lowest NPV of $0.32 million. Additionally, System D, identified as optimally complementary, undergoes comprehensive optimization using advanced algorithms and machine learning, achieving notable efficiencies and cost-effectiveness in power output, exergy, and freshwater production. This study not only underscores the potential of geothermal tri-generation systems in meeting energy, heat, and water needs but also highlights their significant economic benefits and investment attractiveness, offering a compelling case for their adoption in sustainable energy strategies.

Country
Malaysia
Related Organizations
Keywords

HB Economic Theory, 330, 650

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Related to Research communities
Energy Research