Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Strathprintsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Review and Analysis of the Uncertainty Within Cost Models for Floating Offshore Wind Farms

Authors: V. Sykes; M. Collu; A. Coraddu;

A Review and Analysis of the Uncertainty Within Cost Models for Floating Offshore Wind Farms

Abstract

The development and deployment of offshore wind farms in the last decade have seen a dramatic increase, now totalling 743 GW globally (Global Wind Energy Council, 2022). This rapid increase is expected to further continue now with the potential to explore deeper sites with the adoption of floating offshore platforms. Proof of this growth has recently been seen with an impressive 60% of the 25 GW Scotwind leasing sites planning to install floating platforms in the next ten years (Crown estate, 2022 [1], [2]). One main disadvantage of the advancement offshore is uncertainty and the potential increase in costs due to more complex structures and greater distances to shore. The cost increase for floating platforms is expected to be two to three times more expensive than traditional fixed support structures (Eric Paya, 2020). Thus, this work aims to review existing analytical cost models found within the literature to best determine their level of accuracy and compare the assumptions which have been made. Leading on from this review, a collection of all data found in the reviewed literature is presented, which leads to a data analysis that determines the variation across literature and the potential causes. Assessing this literature shows a wide range of model considerations, often leading to assumptions with little or no data to be validated against. Hence, high levels of variation and a lack of consensus on the cheapest floating platform were noted. All aspects of costs related to floating offshore wind systems vary heavily throughout the literature.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

330, Hydraulic engineering. Ocean engineering, 551

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Average
Top 10%
Green
hybrid