Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Science of The T...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Science of The Total Environment
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Algae biofertilisers promote sustainable food production and a circular nutrient economy – An integrated empirical-modelling study

Authors: Juliane Wolf; Sijie Li; Elodie Buisset; Susanne Schmidt; Nicole Robinson; John Roles; Zeenat Rupawalla; +2 Authors

Algae biofertilisers promote sustainable food production and a circular nutrient economy – An integrated empirical-modelling study

Abstract

Agriculture has radically changed the global nitrogen (N) cycle and is heavily dependent on synthetic N-fertiliser. However, the N-use efficiency of synthetic fertilisers is often only 50% with N-losses from crop systems polluting the biosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere. To address the large carbon and energy footprint of N-fertiliser synthesis and curb N-pollution, new technologies are required to deliver enhanced energy efficiency, decarbonisation and a circular nutrient economy. Algae fertilisers (AF) are an alternative to synthetic N-fertiliser (SF). Here microalgae were used as biofertiliser for spinach production. AF production was evaluated using life-cycle analyses. Over 4 weeks, AF released 63.5% of N as bioavailable ammonium and nitrate, and 25% of phosphorous (P) as phosphate to the growth substrate; SF released 100% N and 20% P. To maximise crop N-use and minimise N-leaching, we explored AF and SF dose-response-curves with spinach in glasshouse conditions. AF-grown spinach produced 36% less biomass than SF-grown plants due to AF's slower and linear N-release; SF exhibited 5-times higher N-leaching than AF. Optimised AF:SF blends yielded greater synchrony between N-release and crop-uptake, boosting crop yields and minimising N-loss. Additional benefits of AF included greener leaves, lower leaf nitrate concentration, and higher microbial diversity and water holding capacity of the growth substrate. An integrated techno-economic and life-cycle-analysis of scaled-up microalgae systems (+/- wastewater) normalised to the application dose showed that replacing the most effective SF-dose with AF lowered the annual carbon footprint of fertiliser production from 3.644 kg CO2 m-2 (C-producing) to -6.039 kg CO2 m-2 (C-assimilation). N-loss from growth substrate was lowered by 54%. Embodied energy for AF:SF blends could be reduced by 29% when cultivating microalgae on wastewater. Conclusions: (i) microalgae offer a sustainable alternative to synthetic N-fertiliser for spinach production and potentially other crop systems, (ii) microalgae biofertilisers support the circular-nutrient-economy and several UN-Sustainable-Development-Goals.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Nitrogen, Nutrients, Wastewater, Microalgae, Biomass, Fertilizers

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%