
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Please grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
All Research products
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
Ensuring legitimate project-level claims about net biodiversity outcomes

Authors: Sonter, LJ; Maron, M; Metaxas, A; Bull, JW;
pmid: 38902166
Abstract
Renewable energy projects, such as wind farms and hydropower dams, can indirectly benefit biodiversity by mitigating climate change. However, we explain why such indirect benefits should not contribute towards the accounting of project-level net biodiversity outcomes and provide guidance on the steps needed to legitimately claim no-net-loss of biodiversity.
Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
- University of Oxford United Kingdom
- University of Queensland Australia
- Dalhousie University Canada
- Dalhousie University Canada
Keywords
Conservation of Natural Resources, Climate Change, Biodiversity, Renewable Energy
Conservation of Natural Resources, Climate Change, Biodiversity, Renewable Energy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
Citations provided by BIP!
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
popularity
Popularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Energy Research