
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Selection between alcohols and volatile fatty acids as external carbon sources for EBPR

pmid: 17764715
The purpose of this paper is to provide a basis for selecting alcohols (i.e. ethanol and methanol) or short-chain volatile fatty acids (VFAs) (i.e. acetate and propionate) as the external carbon sources for enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) from wastewaters in adapted or unadapted activated sludge. When ethanol is used in an unacclimated process, a period of adaptation is required by polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs). From 0 to 140 days of ethanol acclimatizing, the P release and uptake rates increased to 6.2 and 7.0 mgP-PO(3)4(-)g(-1)VSSh(-1), respectively. PAOs in ethanol-enriched sludge produced poly-beta-hydroxyvalerate (PHV) (81.9%) as the main polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) and reached an effluent phosphate concentration close to zero (0.10 mgP-PO(3)4(-)L(-1)). On the other hand, methanol was not used by PAOs in 30-day ethanol-acclimated sludge in short-term tests. If EBPR needs to be incidentally supported by substrate addition, VFAs are preferred; for long-term addition also ethanol can be considered.
- Delft University of Technology Netherlands
- University of Girona Spain
- University of Girona Spain
- Catalan Institute for Water Research Spain
Ethanol, Sewage, Methanol, Phosphorus, Acetates, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Carbon, Phosphates, Bioreactors, Propionates
Ethanol, Sewage, Methanol, Phosphorus, Acetates, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Carbon, Phosphates, Bioreactors, Propionates
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).84 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
