Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Smithsonian figsharearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: STM Policy #29
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions

Evaluating the Role of Water as a Cosolvent and an Antisolvent in [HSO4]-Based Protic Ionic Liquid Pretreatment

Authors: Aida R. Abouelela; Amir Al Ghatta; Pedro Verdía; Miu Shan Koo; Jesús Lemus; Jason P. Hallett;

Evaluating the Role of Water as a Cosolvent and an Antisolvent in [HSO4]-Based Protic Ionic Liquid Pretreatment

Abstract

The study focused on the dual role of water as a cosolvent and an antisolvent in the [HSO 4 ]-based protic ionic liquid biomass fractionation process using N , N , N -dimethylbutylammonium hydrogen sulfate, [DMBA]­[HSO 4 ]. The effectiveness of biomass fractionation using [DMBA]­[HSO 4 ] mixed with different concentrations of water of conventional biorefinery feedstocks (Miscanthus and pine softwood) and nonconventional low-cost lignocellulosic biomass waste (treated timber and postconsumer waste wood) was investigated. The pulp composition, lignin extraction, and enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulose pulp were analyzed after pretreatment at 170 °C for 30 min. We showed that it is possible to reduce the ionic liquid use in the process by increasing the water concentration as a cosolvent while still maintaining the effective biomass deconstruction forMiscanthus and postconsumer waste wood. However, softwood biomass showed higher resistance to fractionation at higher water concentrations in the pretreatment medium. We also investigated the impact of reducing the amount of water used as an antisolvent for lignin precipitation in terms of lignin yields and properties. The robust performance of the fractionation process at the optimized antisolvent use was demonstrated using the challenging feedstock pine softwood over six pretreatment cycles. Finally, we demonstrated the significance of evaluating water use for the energy requirements of the process, particularly in the ionic liquid regeneration step, achieving a 65% energy reduction.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified, lignin extraction, biorefinery feedstocks, Science Policy, Plant Biology, 30 min, Biochemistry, water use, regeneration step, energy requirements, cellulose pulp, dimethylbutylammonium hydrogen sulfate, lignocellulosic biomass waste, Space Science, lignin yields, water concentrations, Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified, postconsumer waste wood, fractionation process, pulp composition, optimized antisolvent use, pretreatment cycles, HSO, Ecology, DMBA, 660, feedstock pine, Computational Biology, water concentration, lignin precipitation, Liquid Pretreatment, biomass fractionation process, biomass fractionation, Biotechnology, Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified, biomass deconstruction forMiscanthus, pretreatment medium

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze