
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Thinning Can Reduce Losses in Carbon Use Efficiency and Carbon Stocks in Managed Forests Under Warmer Climate

AbstractForest carbon use efficiency (CUE, the ratio of net to gross primary productivity) represents the fraction of photosynthesis that is not used for plant respiration. Although important, it is often neglected in climate change impact analyses. Here we assess the potential impact of thinning on projected carbon cycle dynamics and implications for forest CUE and its components (i.e., gross and net primary productivity and plant respiration), as well as on forest biomass production. Using a detailed process‐based forest ecosystem model forced by climate outputs of five Earth System Models under four representative climate scenarios, we investigate the sensitivity of the projected future changes in the autotrophic carbon budget of three representative European forests. We focus on changes in CUE and carbon stocks as a result of warming, rising atmospheric CO2 concentration, and forest thinning. Results show that autotrophic carbon sequestration decreases with forest development, and the decrease is faster with warming and in unthinned forests. This suggests that the combined impacts of climate change and changing CO2 concentrations lead the forests to grow faster, mature earlier, and also die younger. In addition, we show that under future climate conditions, forest thinning could mitigate the decrease in CUE, increase carbon allocation into more recalcitrant woody pools, and reduce physiological‐climate‐induced mortality risks. Altogether, our results show that thinning can improve the efficacy of forest‐based mitigation strategies and should be carefully considered within a portfolio of mitigation options.
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory United States
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) United States
- Leibniz Association Germany
- University of California System United States
- Max Planck Society Germany
Carbon sequestration, 570, Atmospheric sciences, Co2 fertilization, Physical geography, 550, Forest model, Life on Land, forest management, GC1-1581, Oceanography, 333, Atmospheric Sciences, Geoinformatics, Climate change, Biology, CO2 fertilization, Research Articles, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550, Forest management, ISIMIP, ddc:550, Physics, carbon sequestration, forest model, GB3-5030, Carbon Use Efficiency, Climate Action, Earth sciences, Chemistry, climate change, Earth Sciences, Engineering sciences. Technology
Carbon sequestration, 570, Atmospheric sciences, Co2 fertilization, Physical geography, 550, Forest model, Life on Land, forest management, GC1-1581, Oceanography, 333, Atmospheric Sciences, Geoinformatics, Climate change, Biology, CO2 fertilization, Research Articles, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550, Forest management, ISIMIP, ddc:550, Physics, carbon sequestration, forest model, GB3-5030, Carbon Use Efficiency, Climate Action, Earth sciences, Chemistry, climate change, Earth Sciences, Engineering sciences. Technology
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).52 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
