<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Climate impact assessments should not discount ‘hot’ models

Name: Climate impact assessments should not discount ‘hot’ models
Keywords: Hot Temperature, Climate Change, Climate Models, Reproducibility of Results

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 23 Aug 2022Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Nature, volume 608, pages 667-667 (issn: 0028-0836, eissn: 1476-4687,

Authors: Jonah Bloch-Johnson; Maria Rugenstein; Jonathan Gregory; B. B. Cael; Timothy Andrews;

doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-02241-6

pmid: 35999296

Climate impact assessments should not discount ‘hot’ models

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Related Organizations

University of Reading
United Kingdom
University of Reading
United Kingdom
Colorado State University
United States
National Oceanography Centre
United Kingdom

Keywords

Hot Temperature, Climate Change, Climate Models, Reproducibility of Results

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	568
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 0.1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 0.01%

Found an issue? Give us feedback

568

Top 0.1%

Top 1%

Top 0.01%

Related to Research communities

Energy Research