
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled

doi: 10.1038/nclimate2868
handle: 10871/20152
Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled
Several methods exist to estimate the cumulative carbon emissions that would keep global warming to below a given temperature limit. Here we review estimates reported by the IPCC and the recent literature, and discuss the reasons underlying their differences. The most scientifically robust number-the carbon budget for CO2 -induced warming only-is also the least relevant for real-world policy. Including all greenhouse gases and using methods based on scenarios that avoid instead of exceed a given temperature limit results in lower carbon budgets. For a >66% chance of limiting warming below the internationally agreed temperature limit of 2 °C relative to pre-industrial levels, the most appropriate carbon budget estimate is 590-1,240 GtCO2 from 2015 onwards. Variations within this range depend on the probability of staying below 2 °C and on end-of-century non-CO2 warming. Current CO2 emissions are about 40 GtCO2 yr -1, and global CO2 emissions thus have to be reduced urgently to keep within a 2 °C-compatible budget.
- Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency Netherlands
- University of Oxford United Kingdom
- University of Zurich Switzerland
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science Switzerland
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Austria
500, Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Environmental Science (miscellaneous), 333, Environmental Systems Analysis, Milieusysteemanalyse, Taverne, SDG 13 - Climate Action, Climate change, Life Science, Leerstoelgroep Milieusysteemanalyse, Climate-change mitigation, Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
500, Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Environmental Science (miscellaneous), 333, Environmental Systems Analysis, Milieusysteemanalyse, Taverne, SDG 13 - Climate Action, Climate change, Life Science, Leerstoelgroep Milieusysteemanalyse, Climate-change mitigation, Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
4 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).243 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
