
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals

doi: 10.1038/nclimate3186
handle: 11343/290559 , 10044/1/78110
Five equitable approaches to mitigation are investigated: the authors find that most developing countries are more ambitious than the average, whilst if developed nations and China adopted the average of the approaches the gap between INDCs and a 2 °C pathway would narrow.
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Germany
- Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research) Germany
- Imperial College London United Kingdom
- University of Melbourne Australia
- ETH Zurich Switzerland
330, CARBON-CYCLE MODELS, Environmental Studies, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, 338, TARGETS, Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences, 0502 Environmental Science and Management, Science & Technology, ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, CLIMATE, Physical Sciences, 0401 Atmospheric Sciences, 0406 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, SIMPLER MODEL, Environmental Sciences
330, CARBON-CYCLE MODELS, Environmental Studies, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, 338, TARGETS, Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences, 0502 Environmental Science and Management, Science & Technology, ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, CLIMATE, Physical Sciences, 0401 Atmospheric Sciences, 0406 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, SIMPLER MODEL, Environmental Sciences
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).298 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
