
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Quantification of Ethanol Concentrations in the Extracellular Fluid of the Rat Brain

pmid: 10987851
Abstract: Traditional microdialysis techniques provide qualitative data, although quantitative data are often required for pharmacodynamic analyses. This study evaluated a potentially usefulin vivo delivery technique to calibrate microdialysis probes for ethanol. We measuredin vivo delivery extraction fractions within subjects across 2 days and found no change over time. We tested the effect of diffusion direction on extraction fraction and found that it was higher for ethanol diffusion out of the probe than for diffusion into the probe, bothin vitro andin vivo. Thein vivo extraction fraction ratio of diffusionIN versus diffusionOUT was 0.65 ± 0.03. Finally, we predicted extracellular brain ethanol concentrations after 1 g/kg ethanol administration usingin vivo delivery, “no net flux” dialysis, orin vivo delivery corrected for diffusion direction with thein vivo extraction fraction ratio. Bothin vivo delivery and “no net flux” dialysis predicted brain concentrations that were approximately one‐third lower than blood concentrations, whereas the correctedin vivo delivery predicted extracellular concentrations very similar to blood concentrations. We conclude that microdialysis calibration methods for ethanol require a measure of extraction fraction for diffusion into the probe. Further studies are needed to establish whether this effect is common to other alcohols.
- The University of Texas System United States
- The University of Texas at Austin United States
Brain Chemistry, Male, Time Factors, Ethanol, Microdialysis, Brain, Reproducibility of Results, Rats, Diffusion, Perfusion, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Calibration, Injections, Intravenous, Linear Models, Animals, Female, Extracellular Space
Brain Chemistry, Male, Time Factors, Ethanol, Microdialysis, Brain, Reproducibility of Results, Rats, Diffusion, Perfusion, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Calibration, Injections, Intravenous, Linear Models, Animals, Female, Extracellular Space
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).36 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
