
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Stochastic scheduling ensuring air quality through wind power and storage coordination

In highly polluted regions, it might be necessary to operate power plants enforcing appropriate emission limits to help ensuring air quality. If the air quality is low and pollutants are difficult to diffuse, few additional emissions should be allowed to avoid further deteriorating the air quality. Wind power helps reducing pollution levels as it substitutes polluting thermal production. However, wind and air pollution are generally anti‐correlated. Storage can be used to shift wind power production from hours when higher pollution levels are allowed to hours when lower pollution levels are allowed to help meeting emission constraints at critical hours. Storage availability also achieves a comparatively lower production cost for the system as a whole. To represent the stochastic nature of wind power production and weather‐dependent emission limits, the authors propose a two‐stage stochastic programming model to analyse the trade‐off emission versus cost in an electric energy system with storage facilities. The first stage represents the day‐ahead scheduling, while the second one represents the real‐time operation under different scenarios. The authors analyse the impact of emission limits and/or storage on generation scheduling by comparing different models using an illustrative example and a case study based on the IEEE 118‐node system.
- University System of Ohio United States
- The Ohio State University United States
- The Ohio State University at Marion United States
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).6 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
