
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Performance comparison between consequent‐pole and inset modular permanent magnet machines

This paper proposes some consequent‐pole (CP) modular permanent magnet (PM) machines with different flux gap (FG) widths and slot/pole number combinations. The corresponding inset modular PM machines having the same magnet volume are also presented for comparison. It has been demonstrated that the output torques of the consequent pole modular machines are always higher than those of the inset modular machines regardless of FG widths and slot/pole number combinations. Other electromagnetic performances such as back‐EMF, cogging torque, and iron losses etc. are calculated by 2D FEA software and compared as well. The advantages and disadvantages of consequent and inset modular PM machines are summarised here.
- University of Sheffield United Kingdom
magnet volume, slot-pole number combinations, consequent PM machines, 2D FEA software, finite element analysis, permanent magnet machines, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), FG widths, inset modular PM machines, electric potential, consequent-pole modular permanent magnet machines, CP modular PM machine, TA1-2040, inset modular permanent magnet machines, flux gap widths, pole modular machines
magnet volume, slot-pole number combinations, consequent PM machines, 2D FEA software, finite element analysis, permanent magnet machines, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), FG widths, inset modular PM machines, electric potential, consequent-pole modular permanent magnet machines, CP modular PM machine, TA1-2040, inset modular permanent magnet machines, flux gap widths, pole modular machines
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).14 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
