Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Quantitative Assessment of Temporally-Resolved Environmental Trade-Offs in the Power Sector

Authors: Rebecca A. M. Peer; Kelly T. Sanders;

A Quantitative Assessment of Temporally-Resolved Environmental Trade-Offs in the Power Sector

Abstract

Developing strategies to reduce the air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with power generation has been a priority across environmental and research communities for many years. Likewise, reducing the freshwater impacts of the power sector has become of increasing interest, prompted by water-stress and heat waves in many regions of the United States. However, there has been very little quantification of the environmental trade-offs between water consumption and air emissions in the power generating industry. Without simultaneously evaluating these environmental variables, solutions aimed to address one environmental priority might lead to unintended consequences in the other. Bridging this research gap will provide a more holistic perspective on the environmental trade-offs associated with electricity generation. This study investigates environmental tradeoffs in the electricity generation sector by quantifying the temporally-resolved water use and emissions rates of power plants within the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), the independent system operator that governs the provision of electricity for the majority of Texas. A unit commitment and dispatch model, which simulates the cost-minimized dispatching algorithm used by ERCOT, is used to quantify hourly data in terms of water consumption, emissions (i.e. carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur oxides), and marginal heat rates for 252 electric generation units in ERCOT across a sample historical year. Annual, seasonal, and daily variations are assessed. The results of this study are intended to inform more balanced decision making and environmental assessments for the power generation sector moving forward.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average