
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Impact of blade mounting structures on cross-flow turbine performance

doi: 10.1063/1.5025322
handle: 1773/41884
Cross-flow or vertical-axis turbines are flow energy conversion devices in which lift forces cause blades to rotate around an axis perpendicular to the flow. In marine currents, rivers, and some wind energy applications, cross-flow turbines are a promising alternative to more conventional axial-flow turbines. The performance implications of the choice of structure used to mount turbine blades to the central shaft are examined experimentally in a recirculating water flume. Turbine performance is found to be strongly dependent on the choice of the mounting structure. Power loss due to rotational drag on these structures is estimated experimentally by rotating the mounting structure without blades. Through a perturbation-theory approach, interactions between turbine blades and mounting structures are examined. Analytical models for the power loss due to mounting structure drag are introduced and shown to be consistent with experiments. To provide guidance for cross-flow turbine design, the models are re-formulated in terms of non-dimensional turbine geometric and operational parameters. Mounting blades solely at their mid-span is shown to decrease performance through multiple fluid effects. Using foil cross-section struts located at the turbine blade tips is found to result in the highest turbine performance.
- University of Mary United States
- University of Washington, University libraries United States
- Washington State University United States
- University of Washington, University libraries United States
532
532
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).20 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
